Stove Testing

Give results of stoves tested. At least three test burns made in succession using 1/2 ounce of denatured alcohol and 2 cups of water. Give any and all additional conditions that exist during testing.

Stoves bought retail and Do-It-Yourself stoves. Everyone is welcome to post their results and post comments.
sudden
Posts: 1058
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 5:33 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby sudden » Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:50 pm

Very nice chart.

Can you plot another showing total weight (stove, windscreen, etc) vs. trend line?

I'd also like to know the percentage gains/losses? of the fastest boiler vs. the most efficient fuel user. (off to find my calculator).
"People are not persuaded by what we say, but rather by what they understand."

sudden
Posts: 1058
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 5:33 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby sudden » Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:07 pm

OK, if I did this correctly, there is a 50% gain in boil time vs. only a 25% increase in fuel usage from the fastest boiler to the most efficient user.
"People are not persuaded by what we say, but rather by what they understand."

sudden
Posts: 1058
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 5:33 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby sudden » Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:07 pm

I probably should have said boil speed
"People are not persuaded by what we say, but rather by what they understand."

User avatar
zelph
Posts: 15768
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:53 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby zelph » Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:44 pm

Nicely done!

Slower to boil on the bench means greater amount of fuel needed in the field and a greater amount of windscreen protection and insulation from cold ground in the case of the Ion and any other stoves that have statistics similar to it.
http://www.woodgaz-stove.com/

User avatar
zelph
Posts: 15768
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:53 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby zelph » Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:00 am

I have been staring at this graph for several hours and here is my takeaway


I thought I had too much time on my hands, you got me beat by a mile or two. :mrgreen:

You got to read this thread submitted by tony. He really knows his stuff. Stove "Geek" representing the "Land Down Under" Australia


viewtopic.php?f=19&t=681&p=4706&hilit=volcano+stove#p4706
http://www.woodgaz-stove.com/

Q_x
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:41 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby Q_x » Fri Jun 04, 2010 3:32 am

:happymeal:
Last edited by Q_x on Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Delete this account, please

User avatar
zelph
Posts: 15768
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:53 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby zelph » Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:32 am

Q_x wrote:This chart is really valuable stuff!!!
If you have extra half an hour, could you (please, please) also measure the ordinary tealight stove, no WS, in your experimental setup, as a "common reference point", so that we can calibrate your results to our individual setups?


I think that would be a big help. It would be the smallest stove used by some hikers.

Be sure to read this thread by "tony":

viewtopic.php?f=19&t=681&p=4706&hilit=volcano+stove#p4706
http://www.woodgaz-stove.com/

Q_x
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:41 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby Q_x » Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:41 pm

:cheers:
Last edited by Q_x on Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Delete this account, please

User avatar
zelph
Posts: 15768
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:53 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby zelph » Fri Jun 04, 2010 3:52 pm

Q_x wrote:2 inches? Everybody is ok with this?


Not for me. I suggest 1" from rim of burner to pot.
http://www.woodgaz-stove.com/

User avatar
zelph
Posts: 15768
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:53 pm

Re: Stove Testing

Postby zelph » Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:44 pm

I did 2 burns this morning. The ground to stove distance was 2" as this is what Jason Klass used in his Klasslight design. The tealight is 5/8" high so the stove to pot distance was 1 3/8".

15 ml boiled 2 cups of 70F in 9:30 with a FO @ 12:00
14 ml boiled 2 cups of 70F ibn 10:10 with a FO @ 11:20

OK, a single run was collected @ 1" stove rim to pot:

14 ml boiled 2 cups of 70 F in 10:20 with FO @ 11:10. This seems reasonable the height difference between this data and the original run was only 3/8".


I combined both tests with high lite in red.

So it seems the pot support can be lowered to 1" and all will be well. More compact and a fraction of a gram less. :mrgreen:

1" is what the pot support is on the StarLyte which has a 2" dia. burner.

Thank you for adding the 1" support to your figures :D
http://www.woodgaz-stove.com/


Return to “Stove Testing and Reviews”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest